No. 45 (2021): The political gap and causes of its growth: the case of Spain
Articles

Misperceptions about the beliefs of others: Cause or consequence of affective polarization?

Ismael Crespo Martínez
University of Murcia
José Miguel Rojo Martínez
University of Murcia
Alberto Mora Rodríguez
University of Murcia

Keywords

  • polarización afectiva,
  • brecha perceptiva,
  • polarización ideológica,
  • falsa polarización
  • affective polarization,
  • perception gap,
  • ideological polarization,
  • false polarization

How to Cite

Crespo Martínez, I., Rojo Martínez, J. M. ., & Mora Rodríguez, A. (2021). Misperceptions about the beliefs of others: Cause or consequence of affective polarization?. Más Poder Local, (45), 75-94. Retrieved from https://www.maspoderlocal.com/index.php/mpl/article/view/falsa-percepcion-polarizacion-afectiva-mpl45

Abstract

To what extent do we have a misperception about other parties and their supporters? This study addresses the concept of “false polarization” in connection with the phenomena of ideological polarization, thematic polarization and affective polarization. For this, data from a national survey conducted by the CEMOP Special Research Group of the University of Murcia were used. The paper focuses on determining the levels of perception gap that exist both at an ideological level (differences between the self-placement of the voters of each party and the location that the rest make on the different parties) and thematic (how the voters of each party think that voters of other parties think about high-contrast cultural issues). The conclusions point to the tendency of the supporters of a formation to exaggerate the extent of their disagreement with other groups, especially with those of the opposing ideological bloc, as a way of increasing their identification with the group to which they belong and their rejection of the opposite group. In addition, important findings were reached on the relationship between ideological and thematic polarization, and between the perception gap that occurs at the ideological and thematic level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abramowitz, A. I. y Webster, S. (2016): «The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century». Electoral Studies, 41: 12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud. 2015.11.001
  2. Bougher, L. D. (2017): «The correlates of discord: identity, issue alignment, and political hostility in polarized America». Political Behavior, 39(3): 731-762. doi: 10.1007/s11109-016-9377-1
  3. Chambers, J. R.; Baron, R. S. e Inman, M. L. (2006): «Misperceptions in intergroup conflict». Psychological Science, 17(1): 38-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x
  4. Dalton, R. (2008): «The quantity and the quality of party systems: party system polarization, its measurement and its consequences». Comparative Political Studies, 41(7): 899-920. doi: 10.1177/0010414008315860
  5. Fiorina, M. P. (2017): Unstable majorities: polarization, party sorting, and political stalemate. California: Hoover Institution Press Publication.
  6. Gidron, N.; Adams, J. y Horne, W. (2020): American affective polarization in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108914123.
  7. Iyengar, S. y Westwood, S. J. (2015): «Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization». American Journal of Political Science, 59(3): 690-707. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12152
  8. Iyengar, S; Lelkes, Y.; Levendusky, M.; Malhotra, N. y Westwood, S. J. (2019): «The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States». Annual Review of Political Science, 22: 129-146. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
  9. Levendusky, M.S. y Malhotra, N. (2016): «(Mis) perceptions of partisan polarization in the American public». Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1): 378-391. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfv045
  10. Mason, L. (2015): «‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: the differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization». American Journal of Political Science, 59: 128-45. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12089
  11. Miller, L. (2020): «Polarización en España: más divididos por ideología e identidad que por políticas públicas». EsadeEcPol Insigh #18: 1-14. Recuperado de: https://dobetter.esade.edu/es/polarizacion-espana?_wrapper_format=html
  12. Orriols, L. (2021): «La polarización afectiva en España: bloques ideológicos enfrentados». EsadeEcPol Insigh #28: 1-14. Recuperado de: https://www.esade.edu/ecpol/es/publicaciones/polarizacion-afectiva/
  13. Reiljan, A. (2020): ‘Fear and loathing across party lines’ (also) in Europe: Affective polarisation in European party systems». European Journal of Political Research, 59(2): 376-396. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12351
  14. Rogowski, J. C. y Sutherland, J. L. (2016): «How ideology fuels affective polarization». Political Behaviour, 38(2): 485-508. doi: 10.1007/s11109-015-9323-7
  15. Sani, D. y Sartori, G. (1980): «Polarización, fragmentación y competición en las democracias occidentales». Revista del Departamento de Derecho Político (UNED), 7: 7-37. doi: 10.5944/rdp.7.1980.8032
  16. Simón, P. (2020): «The multiple Spanish elections of April and May 2019: the impact of territorial and left-right polarisation». South European Society and Politics: 1-34. doi: 10.1080/136087 46.2020.1756612
  17. Tajfel, H. y Wilkes, A. L. (1963): «Classification and quantitative judgement». British Journal of Psychology, 54(2): 101-114. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1963.tb00865.x
  18. Webster, S. W. y Abramowitz, A. I. (2017): «The ideological foundations of affective polarization in the US electorate». American Politics Research, 45(4): 621-647. doi: 10.1177/1532673X 17703132
  19. Yudkin, D. A., Hawkins, S. y Dixon, T. (2019): The perception gap: How false impressions are pulling Americans apart. New York: More in Common. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/r3h5q