No. 55 (2024): Political communication in the face of economic crises.
Consultancy Notes

Another political communication is possible: the disruption of Responsible Communication and the ICR Model

Alberto Zuart Garduño
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Bio

Keywords

  • Modelo ICR,
  • Comunicación Responsable,
  • Crisis política,
  • Democracia
  • ICR model,
  • Responsible Communication,
  • political crisis,
  • Democracy

How to Cite

Zuart Garduño, A. (2024). Another political communication is possible: the disruption of Responsible Communication and the ICR Model. Más Poder Local, (55), 138-145. Retrieved from https://www.maspoderlocal.com/index.php/mpl/article/view/modelo-icr-comunicacion-responsable-mpl55

Abstract

Modern politics faces a profound crisis of identity, trust, and representation. Political leaders, institutions, and governments struggle to regain the connection with their citizens in a world saturated with empty speeches. Amid this storm, political communication has succumbed to deceitful tactics and superficial praise, instead of delving into the true heart of democracy: authentic political discourse that arises from the voice of the majority. Given this landscape, we must seek solutions. One promising avenue is the ICR Model: a methodology of Responsible Communication aimed at strengthening identity, bolstering trust, and restoring true representativeness. Its focus lies in identifying and consolidating shared values among leaders, institutions, governments, and society. The goal is clear: to establish responsible communication based on agreed-upon social values that reinforce the connection between those who lead and those who are led. The ICR Model is not a mere theory. It has been applied in various political communication campaigns in the context of economic, political, and social crises, successfully revitalizing narratives, bolstering public trust, and, above all, paving the way toward a more robust and participatory democracy. These are not just strategies; they are steps toward a future in which politics truly serves the common good.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Barreda, M. (2011): «La calidad de la democracia: Un análisis comparado de América Latina». Revista política y gobierno, 18(2): 265-295. Recuperado de: http://www.politicaygobierno.cide.edu/index.php/pyg/article/view/157
  2. Burns, J. M. (1978): Leadership. Harper & Row.
  3. Cantón, E. (2022, agosto): «La confianza de los ciudadanos en las instituciones, bajo mínimos desde la crisis del 2008. El Periódico de España». Recuperado de: https://www.epe.es/es/politica/20220822/desconfianza-instituciones-riesgo-salud-democratica-crisis-2008-14312243
  4. Centro de Estudios Políticos (CEP) (2023): Encuesta CEP Nº 89 [Encuesta Junio-Julio]. Recuperado de: https://www.cepchile.cl/encuesta/encuesta-cep-n-89/
  5. Díaz, A. (2014): «La (in)satisfacción con el funcionamiento de la democracia en América Latina». Iberoamericana, 54: 169-173.
  6. Galli, C. (2013): El malestar de la democracia. FCE.
  7. González, R. y Salvatierra, V. (2021, 28 de septiembre): «Crisis de representatividad y vuelco a los independientes». LEAS. Recuperado de: https://leas.uai.cl/2021/09/28/crisis-de-representatividad-y-vuelco-a-los-independientes/
  8. Habermas, J. (1989): The structural transformation of the public sphere. [Polity Press].
  9. Hofmeister, W. (2021): Los partidos políticos y la democracia. Teoría y práctica en una visión global. Marcial Pons, Ediciones Jurídicas y Sociales.
  10. López Muñoz, M. (2021): Conocimiento experto y democracia en España y la Unión Europea [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia]. Recuperado de: http://espacio.uned.es/fez/eserv/tesisuned:ED-Pg-UniEuroMlopezm/LOPEZ_MUNOZ_Manuel_Tesis.pdf
  11. Lozano, C. (2023, 3 de agosto): «Crisis de identidad en la política mexicana: alianzas que traicionan los principios de los partidos políticos». El Heraldo. Recuperado de: https://heraldodemexico.com.mx/opinion/2023/8/3/crisis-de-identidad-en-la-politica-mexicana-alianzas-que-traicionan-los-principios-de-los-partidos-politicos-527478.html
  12. Maslow, A. H. (1943): «A theory of human motivation». Psychological Review, 50(4): 370-396.
  13. Maslow, A. H. (1954): Motivation and personality. Harper & Row.
  14. Megías, A. (2020): «Una década de crisis: los cambios en su naturaleza». Reis. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 169: 103-122.
  15. Putnam, R. (2000): Bowling Alone. Simon & Schuster.
  16. Zollmann, A. y Couldry, N. (2016): «The price of connection: ‘surveillance capitalism’». The conversation. Recuperado de: https://theconversation.com/the-price-of-connection-surveillance-capitalism-64124